Tuesday 25 November 2014

Free-writing: The Ultimate Cure For Stress






   As a student, the pressures of everyday life seem to be magnified by about a thousand, maybe more some days. Finding time to fit in friends, family, my job, work placement and a little bit of me time seems impossible! I have however discovered an easy way to get rid of negativity and pent up stress - free-writing. Before I had tried free-writing as a method of relaxation, I didn't have much faith in it at all. After a stressful day of lectures and reading, the last thing I would want to do is pick up a book and write but believe me, it works. It's surprisingly therapeutic picking up a pen, your favourite notebook and just letting you're thoughts run wild on paper; more often than not, ideas for my stories and other genres of writing have stemmed from free-writing.

What are the benefits of free-writing?
The main benefit of free-writing is that your writing will be honest and full of emotion. Try writing when you're feeling a strong emotion, whether it's when you're feeling heartbroken or when you're feeling so happy you could burst! It doesn't matter if what you've written doesn't make sense because it meant something to you when you wrote it. It's most important to write in the midst of these emotions because often, they are the trickiest to make realistic in fiction.

My tips:
1. Pick a notebook that you really like. This may seem like a silly starting point but it is important. If you pick a notebook that you like, without realising, you'll be more inclined to go and write in it. Try http://www.paperchase.co.uk/ they may be a bit more expensive but they make up for it in being gorgeous!

2. Write something as soon as you wake up. Keep a notebook by your bedside, that way you can record your dreams as soon as you wake from them. A lot of the time when I'm led in bed before sleeping an idea will come to me and I will write continuously for up to 10 minutes. If you put a thought on hold, you'll lose it.

3. Write without thinking. Write whatever is in your mind, it might come out completely backwards, it might be inappropriate, it might be a jumble of letters, it might be purely based on swearing (I've done this numerous times). The point is that it doesn't matter, it's for you to see and nobody else. Here are some examples of what you're free-writing might look like:



4. Do your writing exercises. A writing exercise can be anything, even if it's just recalling a childhood memory and writing as much as you can remember down. The aim is to keep your imagination active and to get yourself to draw on your personal experiences. Perhaps it will inspire you to write an autobiographical piece.

5. In a nutshell: It's point is to keep going, and that is the only point.


Beginner Guidelines

1. Give yourself a time limit (this can be anything between five to twenty minutes usually).

2. Keep your hand moving until your time is up. Don't stop to think about what your writing and don't check over as you write.

3. The grammar and neatness of your work doesn't matter, so don't worry.

4. If you run out of ideas or enthusiasm halfway through, write about what you fancy for tea, what the weather's like, how much you hate sprouts; anything.

5. If you feel annoyed because you can't think of anything to write, then write about being annoyed about it.

6. When you've used your time up, close your notebook and don't read over what you've done immediately; go back to it a few days later.






Saturday 22 November 2014

Wuthering Heights - Feminist Criticism



   Emily Bronte's 1847 Gothic romance novel, Wuthering Heights, can easily be analysed and critiqued through a feminist lens. The novel is seen by many critics as a novel that introduced a change in the way women were coming to be observed in society and how things were changing for women, thus making this novel a controversial one. Bronte conveys this change in society not only through female characters such as Catherine Earnshaw, but surprisingly through Heathcliff's character also.   
   The Victorian period was a hard time for women as they had to measure up to what was expected of them. For example, the Victorian feminine ideal was a woman that was 'the angel in the house'; a feminine figure that ensured hospitality and a moral guide, and also to be a paragon of virtue. Women were to be molded into this ideal and were expected to live by it. Catherine is seen by many as a feminist role model and her independence in the beginning of the novel separates her from the female norms of this period. Catherine doesn't care for dresses and being pretty she would much rather play on the moors with Heathcliff barefoot. However we see how Catherine eventually falls into being a lady through her transformation at Thrushcross Grange. Nelly refers to Catherine's transformation as a "reform" (Bronte, 1847, pg. 63) This shows the audience to see how a woman can't lead a carefree life in Victorian society, the conventions give security for women. Lyn Pykett explains how Catherine's transformation illuminates the power of the social production of female gentility. Furthermore, we see how her personality changes with the change in her appearance. As Catherine confides in Nelly Dean about her acceptance of Edgar's hand in marriage, we discover how her place as a woman in society has been persuaded by the conventions that have been set up for women. Social ambition is what motivates her now, not her wild passions and love. She explains "It would degrade me to marry Heathcliff now; so he shall never know I love him" (pg. 86). Here we see how Catherine has moved from changing the conventions on her own terms, too succumbing to the conventions for women.  
   As Catherine succumbs to becoming a lady, Heathcliff also falls into a position of equal powerlessness. Heathcliff is disempowered due to him being dark skinned and "gipsy in aspect" (pg. 27), he has no prospects and isn't heir to any money or property. This way Heathcliff can be read as a male character with a female position in society. He is not eligible. Edgar is the one who is always referred to as 'the master' and is the one who has all the power and masculinity. Heathcliff is feminine next to Edgar and he is dispossessed, ruled by the father and an outcast from society with his unknown background. The fact that Catherine spoils her own destiny and accepts Edgar to be her husband is a display of the struggle for women in society. Money and property was a key aspect of acceptance. Because Heathcliff isn't worthy in societies eyes (despite being worthy in Catherine's eyes) she goes against her own wishes and hearts desires.  
   Despite Catherine's rejection of Heathcliff for a better life, they both end up in the same condition at the end of the novel; unable to eat and feverish. There are suggestions that Heathcliff is a complimentary part of Catherine throughout the novel. First he is the manifestation of Catherine's desire for a whip. He is "a complimentary addition to her being who fleshes out all her lacks" (pg. 265). Then Catherine states that "he is more myself than I am" (pg. 88) and also Heathcliff arranges for his body to merge with Catherine's after death so that they become indistinguishable. All of these points collectively support the idea of Heathcliff being portrayed as a female type character. Furthermore, the fact that he is dis-empowered and is characterized as the female puts more strain on his relationship with Catherine and pushes them further apart. The idea that they won't fit together becomes more apparent.  
   Female writers in the Victorian period were directed to abstain from writing social and political criticism in their work in their work because of their restricted position as female writers in the literary world. Critics have argued that the rural and remote setting of Wuthering Heights can be a representation of women's remote position from society and modern industry.   
   Wuthering Heights has attracted a large number of feminist critics due to the autobiographical nature of the novel. Emily Bronte would have drawn on her personal experiences as a female in a society where women were highly inferior to men. Feminists readings of the novel illuminate the focus on a "female tradition" in Victorian literature. Bronte can be seen as started a new female tradition with this female empowering novel.   Lyn Pykkets essay titled "Changing The Names: The Two Catherines" (Pykett, 1989, pg. 86) highlights the mirroring of both Catherine and Cathy. Pykett supports my point that Emily Bronte's views are shown through the novel and its plot is contradictory to the ideas of women during the period. For example, Catherine's marriage to Edgar should have resolved her issues and fulfilled her social ambition but instead it deepens her problems. Catherine's inner conflict begins when she is still a child. Catherine begins life as a carefree, independent female who is more concerned with nature and being outdoors than the domestic sphere and its constraints. This is the beginning of her inner conflict; who she is inside and who she is expected to be. Lyn Pykett explains the "difficulties of trying to be the heroine of one's own life in a social and domestic milieu which cannot provide a theater for heroinism" (pg. 92) . She adds on the point that Catherine's sense of power does not leave her with a feeling of self fulfillment. I agree with this point indefinitely but it is also apparent that the only way Catherine can or would achieve complete self fulfilment would be if she could be with Heathcliff, he is her counterpart and soul mate. The social constraints that restrict Catherine is what prevents her from reaching the fulfillment that she so desperately sought after.   
   It is interesting to look closer at Cathy's character and question whether or not she is a representation of what Catherine's life would have been like lest she refused Edgars hand in marriage. It has been discussed that Cathy and Hareton's relationship can be interpreted as similar to the relationship that Catherine and Heathcliff would have shared, had they become a couple and obviated the social normality's that protruded on their daily lives and caused them such heartache. It is exciting to watch Cathy and Hareton's relationship as it acts out what we as an audience so desperately wanted to see happen with Catherine and Heathcliff. Pykett describes Heathcliff as "an unfulfilled possibility, a route not taken" (pg. 469). However, the fact that Heathcliff and Catherine could not be together adds to the realism of the novel and is needed in the plot to give a truthful image of the feminine inferiority of the Victorian period. Situations similar to what Heathcliff and Catherine undertake would have been common and it is the fact that we know that Catherine wants to abstain from the marital traditions and rebel is what makes this novel both interesting and controversial. The truthfulness of Catherine's struggle in the novel is what makes Wuthering Heights so open and appealing to feminist criticism and furthermore, historical criticism.    
   The beginning of the novel and indeed the most part of it is key in deciphering the story of Catherine Earnshaw. Lockwood is the one who discovers her late identities scratched into paint in his quarters during his visit to Wuthering Heights. Lockwood's revelation of the writings is an important part of the narrative as it lays out Catherine's journey through her relationships and maps out the stages of her feelings before we learn about them.
Lockwood reads:   
"This writing was nothing but a name repeated in all kinds of characters large and small -
Catherine Earnshaw, here and there varied to Catherine Heathcliff, and then again to Catherine Linton" (pg. 38). The variation of both the style of writing and placement can be seen as a representation of the mixture of emotions that Catherine endured and also the uncertainty in her life. This moment when Lockwood discovers her graffiti is what sets up the narrative for us and fires up our curiosity. Furthermore, Catherine writing down two marital names would have been very unusual to a Victorian audience. It is another instance where feminist criticism thrives as having two marital names suggests that Catherine was married twice at first glance. This would have been both interesting to an audience and recognized as a rarity to most. Both names circulate through the text and each name is associated with a different aspect of Catherine's personality. When she is Catherine Linton, she is posing as the person society wants her to be, the person she is expected to be in both the public sphere and the private sphere; the 'angel in the house'. As Catherine Heathcliff, she is who she wants be, who she really is. As we journey through the novel, we become more sympathetic towards Catherine in relation to her writing Heathcliff as her surname. This is because we can see that she knows she can never be Catherine Heathcliff but amidst her real title as Catherine Linton, her desire to be Heathcliff's wife is still present.  
   The novel as a whole raises the question 'What is a woman?' or 'What does a woman want?'. Both questions are essentially based around Catherine's inability to choose between two men. This is a typical plot that a Victorian romance novel would follow, however, Bronte defines the plot in her novel by displaying the difficulties living as a woman. Catherine is interpreted as the heroine in the novel, however, she can't be the heroine of her own life because she is doomed by her gender. She has no authority where she needs it most. Bronte uses the question "What Is a woman?" and shows us what a woman really is, and what she has to be. Catherine is the creator of feminism in the novel. Wuthering Heights represents a new age in literature and a change in a dominantly patriarchal society.  

Bibliography  

-  Barr, K. (2011) Representation of Women In Gothic Literature: Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available: http://suite101.com/a/representation-of-women-in-gothic-literature-wutheringheights-a343037  Page Break  
-  Bronte, E. (1847) Wuthering Heights. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.  - Gilbert, S & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: the Women Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literature Imagination. [Online] Available:
-  Jacobs, E. (2011) Reflections Of Elizabeth: Feminist Criticism and Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available: http://elizjacobs.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/feminist-criticism-andwuthering.html   
-  Peterson, L. (2003) Wuthering Heights: Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. 2nd edn.
London: PALGRAVE.  
-  Pykett, L. (1989) Women Writers: Emily Bronte. USA: Barnes & Noble Books.  - Senf, C. (1985) Emily Bronte's version of Feminist History: Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available:

Sunday 9 November 2014

Festive Reading ❄


Top 5 Things You Didn't Know About A Christmas Carol

1. Dickens completed the novel in just 6 weeks. After he began writing the novel he became obsessed and couldn't stop until he had completed it. Dicken's wanted the novel to be released before christmas and it sold out three days after it's release on the 17 December 1843.

2. He enjoyed giving public readings of A Christmas Carol. He enjoyed dressing in evening wear that consisted of a bright dinner jacket and sparkling watch-chain for performing. He would have the stage set up with just a desk and oil lamp, keeping it as natural as possible.

3. Dickens completed two reading tours to America. This would be a standard right of passage for any accomplished author these days, but in the Victorian era, this would have been a huge achievement for Dickens. He earned £19,000 from the second tour, equaling just over £1,000,000 in today's money.

4. On performance days, Dickens would follow a specific and extraordinary diet. For breakfast, two tablespoons of rum mixed with cream. For tea, a pint of champagne. Before performance, a sherry with raw egg in it. During performance, he would sip on beef tea, whatever that is.

5. Dicken began his public readings with A Christmas Carol, and that's where they ended. After carrying out readings of the novel, he has to stop the process due to health failure.


   This year, I'm reading A Christmas Carol (again)! As a collector of Penguin's Clothbound Classics (pictured above) I recommend this book to any Dickens fan. It features the classic novel but also includes other seasonal writings, last year I read one short story every night before bed, you can read each with a single mug of hot chocolate.
'Marley was dead, to begin with' - we all know the opening line and the plot, does that mean it's pointless reading it? It's festive and seasonal, the perfect book to curl up with on cosy winter nights in. My love for the novel is equally shared with The Muppets Christmas Carol (featuring Micheal Caine) but pulling out this book in late November has become a yearly tradition for me. 

Gothic Genre Conventions: 'Carmilla' and 'The Bloody Chamber'

   

   Gothic fiction was and still is to this day one of the most popular genres of fiction. According to David De Vore "the Gothic novel took shape mostly in England from 1790 to 1830" as stated in his essay titles "The Gothic Novel". Along with Gothic being a genre on its own, there are sub genres too. For example, gothic romance and gothic horror. 'Carmilla' by Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu is more of a gothic horror story whereas 'The Bloody Chamber' by Angela Carter is more of a mixture between gothic romance and gothic horror. There are typical features that most gothic stories will include but it's how they are presented to us that sets each story apart.
   Both 'Carmilla' and 'The Bloody Chamber' are both classed as short stories or 'Nouvelle' (Novella) as named by Henry James. Joyce Carol Oates claimed that a shorter form increases intensity and "concentration of imagination" (Oates, 1992.) which is successful in making the story more enjoyable and exciting to the reader although gothic fiction tends to be exciting anyway. One of the more common features in gothic fiction is the mysterious setting. This instantly creates an atmosphere for the reader and projects the nature of the story to the audience. Setting is critically important in gothic literature as it can hint towards or represent the character and their intentions.
   For example, 'The Bloody Chamber' for the most part, is set in a castle. Horace Walpole is said to have created the gothic genre with his sixteenth century novel The Castle of Otranto; even the first piece of gothic literature featured a castle and it has become a classic setting for the gothic. The description of the setting is uncanny and typical of what we would expect in an old castle. There are "gilded mirrors" (pg. 6) and "turrets of misty blue" with a "spiked gate" (pg. 9). The castle is described as "a mysterious, amphibious place" (pg. 9) and just from these few descriptive phrases we have a clear image of the setting and an unsettling atmosphere has been created. The word "gothic" was first created to describe architecture thus making setting a critically important part of the description. The description goes into deeper detail by telling of how "the walls on which his ancestors in the stern regalia of rank lined up with their dark eyes and white faces" (pg. 9) look down upon our character. We immediately associate these 'stern' images with her husband and get a negative feeling of the place and of him. Carter uses description from the beginning to get an almost immediate reaction from the reader and grabs their interest straight away where as Le Fanu's 'Carmilla' is a more prolonged and indirect text.
   The opening description in 'Carmilla' is much more mysterious and aloof describing the setting as a "lonely and primitive place". The difference in this description of setting is that we wonder more about where Laura is. We aren't told she's at a castle, but we know she is making her way to somewhere unknown, it's just a 'place' to us. We then get to the description of the mysterious house and again it is typical of what we expect. "Nothing can be more picturesque or solitary. It stands on a slight eminence in a forest. The road, very old and narrow, passes in front of its drawbridge, never raised in my time, and its moat, stocked with perch, and sailed over by many swans, and floating on its surface white fleets of water lilies". The effect is still the same with each different setting and both are very stereotypical gothic environments. Both texts adhere to this gothic trope well and in any gothic fiction, this is a key aspect in relation to the effectiveness of the plot.
   In addition to the setting, the characters appearance is also a crucial gothic convention. A characters appearance is a reflection of who they are, meaning whether they are essentially good or bad. We don't specifically need a description of the main characters appearance, a description of the people surrounding them can also be effective. In 'The Bloody Chamber', Carter describes the housekeepers face as a "bland, pale, impassive, dislikeable face beneath the impeccably starched white linen headdress of the region". All of the words used are negative and portray in emotionless and almost corpse-like face. It is interesting that we don't get a name for our characters in 'The Bloody Chamber'. Despite this, we feel more of a connection to our main character than we do with  'Laura' in 'Carmilla'. We could view this as experimentation with identity. It is clear that our wife in Carter's story doesn't have her own identity, her new husband dictates what she wears. For instance, the ruby choker with its "flashing crimson jewels round her throat" (pg. 6). She tells us "he made me put my choker on" (pg. 13). In addition to this. Laura in 'Carmilla' is seen to be weak in character and doesn't seem to have a strong personality or identity. Laura mentions that she is "profoundly disappointed" when she discovers the girl who would have been a new companion is found to be dead. She seems to be very sheltered and also desperately seeking friendship. She seems to live her life through her father as there is no mention of anybody else. Due to these characters being stripped of their identities, they become the stereotypical damsels in distress and almost become perfect prey for the dominating characters such as Carmilla and the husband in 'The Bloody Chamber'.
   Literature critic Marshall Brown describes gothic novels as "thought experiments that test the limits not just of human endurance, but more specifically of human reason" (Brown, 1987). And goes on to say that we "devote far more space to the thoughts and feelings of the victim and (often) of the persecuting demon than to the mechanisms of punishment and torment". This is a very agreeable point. The conventions in gothic literature have a very specific structure in terms of plot and content. Almost every piece of gothic fiction that you read will result in the point Brown has made and is indeed the case with both 'Carmilla' and 'The Bloody Chamber'. We do feel empathy with both female victims because of the situation they've been forced into and we feel cathartic as justice prevails. The plot structure is typical of a gothic works of literature.
   Aside from the physicality of gothic literature, it is the emotional aspects of the genre that engages us most. For example, the tension between relationships and the dark secrets and anxiety of boundaries. The secretive forbidden room in 'The Bloody Chamber' is the main focus of the story and is what captivates the audience throughout. It is almost predictable that our character will end up entering the room but the predictability doesn't make the story boring like it would in other genres, we want her to enter to satisfy our personal interest. Similarly, in 'Carmilla' there are uncanny hints towards vampires and we suspect that Carmilla is somehow involved in the deaths. Although all of this seems obvious to us, it helps to create tension and suspense in the story. The idea that they could get caught and found out at any moment keeps the audience on edge. Despite the ending in both stories being slightly predictable the twists at the end show experimentation with the genre.
Gothic literature's main aim is to provoke fear in the reader. The more mystery there is the more effective it is on the reader.
   It is common to have a dark revelation towards the end of gothic fiction that creates a climax. Carter reveals the chamber to us and our suspicions are confirmed. From the moment she takes "the forbidden key from the heap" the pace of the story dramatically increases. Our curiosity must be satisfied just as hers must be. As she describes the contents of the room our fear is intensified. The "absolute darkness" and "instruments of mutilation" come as a stark shock and now the seriousness of the situation takes effect. We want her to leave but she stays intensifying the action. Quite similarly, Carmilla leaves us in a state of shock as all the strange occurances all come together towards the end and are explained by Carmilla being revealed as a vampire. When the woodsman describes the same symptoms in his deceased daughter as Laura was experiencing, we breathe a sigh of relief as Laura has escaped those circumstances.
   Fear of the unknown is what interests us most about gothic fiction. The ending of a gothic story is what can prolong our fear and thoughts on the story. Some people would argue that not giving closure to the ending of a short story prevents the reader gaining a sense of fulfillment in a piece of work.  However, there are many authors that resist on giving closure in their stories and it has worked well with the nature of the story and can also be seen as a reflection of the content. 'Carmilla' (Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu, 1872) is a prime example of an open ending. We feel fulfilled due to the fact that Carmilla has been killed, but not all is explained to us, and when we discover that Laura thinks she still hears her 'footsteps' the element of the unknown is complimentary to the gothic theme of the story. Laura leaves us with perplexing questions such as "How did she pass out from her room, leaving the door locked on the inside?" and "How did she escape from the house without unbarring door or window?". Similarly to 'Carmilla', 'The Bloody Chamber' also features an ending that resists closure and promotes thought. Although the ending is neat and tied up, we are still yearning to find out how our main character goes on to live after her near death experience and how her mother knew exactly how she was in trouble. In terms of conventions within the gothic genre, both stories adhere to the structure that was created for the gothic genre, but Carter and Le Fanu both experiment with the genre by pulling in a sudden twist to the storyline, thus creating a bigger impact on the audience and creating something slightly different for gothic fiction followers.


 
Bibliography
- Carter, A. (1979) The Bloody Chamber. England: Vintage.
- Brown, M. (1987) A Philosophical View of the Gothic Novel: Studies in Romanticism. [Online] Available: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/brown.html Accessed: 08/01/14
- De Vore, D et al. The Gothic Novel. [Online] Available: http://cai.ucdavis.edu/waters-sites/gothicnovel/155breport.html Accessed: 08/01/14
- Le Fanu, J. (1872) Carmilla. In a Glass Darkly (Oxfords World's Classics 1999). USA: Oxford University Press.
- Le Fanu, J. (1872) Carmilla. [Online] Available: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/10007/10007-h/10007-h.htm Accessed: 06/01/14
- Oates, J. (1992) The Oxford Book of American Short Stories. [Online] Available: http://www.usfca.edu/jco/oxfordbookofamericanshortstories/ Accessed: 08/01/14

Saturday 8 November 2014

Why Should You Write Essays?


Why write essays? I love to write essays, I would go as far as to say I find it therapeutic and relaxing. If you understand the value of doing something, you will most likely feel more positive in tackling it. I'm going to discuss why essay writing is more than just a monthly assignment.

1. Organisation. Essay writing forces you to organise your thinking and allows you to create ideas surrounding your topic of interest. Organisation is crucial in allowing your understanding of the subject, if your thoughts are organised, you will feel confident in what you are about to discuss.

2. Feedback. Similarly to organisation skills, feedback is incredibly important in ensuring progress. Don't be afraid to accept criticism because it's all constructive criticism, there's a difference. As a writer, I accept criticism on a daily basis. An important part of my degree is sharing my work with others and taking on board other peoples ideas and suggested improvements to ensure a polished piece of writing. If you were asked to look at a piece of work you've written and outline both your strengths and weaknesses, you'd find it harder than you think. As humans, it's natural for us to focus on the negatives as opposed to the positives. This is why feedback is so important, it's not a rejection of you're hard work, it can be both appraisal and honest advice.

3. Revision. It's almost certain that once you have written an essay, you will refer back to it in the future. This could be for revision material, or it could be as a template for a new essay you are about to begin. If you learn the correct way to write an essay, you will always have a well written piece of work to keep and help you out in the future.

There are four points to keep in mind when writing an essay, the first being interpretation and personal response to the essay question. This is perhaps the most important point to remember. If you hide behind the text by paraphrasing, you're not bringing anything new to the table. Personal interpretation is essential in securing those high marks and original ideas.

Secondly, research into the subject. This is a no brainer, you need to secure some sort of research in your chosen essay topic in order for your work to sound plausible. This can range from anything between plot summary's, critic notes or similar essays into your study. Furthermore, planning goes hand in hand with research. As you begin to research, you'll find yourself planning the points your going to make. It's a good idea to write these down as you go along.

Finally, writing the essay. The best advice that I can give you is to create an essay plan or outline before you attempt to put pen to paper. An essay plan is critical in insuring your essay flows smoothly. Make sure you arrange each paragraph so that it relates to the next, you can then join these together by using phrases such as "furthermore" or "in addition to this". 

Happy writing!

Songs To Read To


When I asked my best friend if she listens to music when she reads she replied with "Ew, no, I need to be in complete silence to enjoy any book! How the hell can you read with music on?". I like reading with music because I'm both a book and music addict. Combining the both equals the best night in in the history of the world! Here are my favourites from my 'book' playlist on iTunes:


                                                   1. José González - Heartbeats





                                            2. The Neighbourhood - Sweater Weather



                                                          3. Atlas Genius - Trojans


                                                           4. Vance Joy - Riptide


                                                   5. The Flaming Lips - Fight Test



                                                  6. Young The Giant - Cough Syrup


                                            7. Benjamin Francis Leftwich - Pictures



                                                           8. Bon Iver - Skinny Love


                                                  9. Jack Johnson - Better Together


                                                        10. Fleet Foxes - Mykonos



Friday 7 November 2014

Why Everyone Should Love & Read Steven King



As a celebration of Stephen King's 'Revival' being released this month, I've decided to give you a few reasons why you should read Stephen King and put this book on you're Christmas wish list.
Stephen King is one of my all time favourite authors, and if you know me, you'll find this a little strange as my usual choice of genre is Victorian Literature, you know the big heavy hardbacks that you find on a dusty shelf in your Grandmother's house? Yeah, I've probably read that. Why do I love Stephen King so much? It's not just because I love horror and thriller fiction, it's in fact the stories that surround the genres that I'm obsessed with. I bet you're are thinking 'he always writes about the same thing'. No, this is as far away from the truth as you could possibly get. Yes, thriller and horror fiction is his forte, but no two books are the same, I promise you. I would love to meet Stephen King just to ask where his complex ideas come from. His imagination is magical, asking him where his ideas come from would be like asking Dynamo "how did you do that?" - you're not going to get an answer.
1. The King isn't all about gross harrowing details, underneath the cynicism, there is in fact a big sense of humour. At some points, I will be sat in bed trying to stifle my giggles in my dressing gown.

2. He has so much knowledge. As a writer myself, the most valuable advice anyone has given me is to 'write what you know'. If this is the case with King, he must have lived an awfully interesting life. His knowledge of ghost and folk stories is what makes his writing so addictive, it allows us to enter a fantasy world full of endless possibilities.

3. He gives honest advice to aspiring writers like myself: "Read and write four to six hours a day. If you cannot find time for that, you can't expect to become a good writer". He gets up each day and sets a mark of 2000 words and doesn't stop writing until he's met the amount.

4. He's a genius in making the horrific incidents from his novels seem absolutely normal or possible in everyday life.

5. I have been reading Stephen King from my early teens, and now at twenty I still enjoy his works.

6. If you're more of short story lover than a bookworm, he's written 160. I recommend "Riding The Bullet".

7. He has a house in Bangor. I'm Welsh, I just put this one in for good measure.

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About William Shakespeare



   Many will agree that you either absolutely adore Shakespeare, or hate him with the fire of a thousand suns (as quoted from 10 things I hate about you). Here are 10 facts you probably didn't know about Shakespeare:

1. He wasn't the only Shakespeare. Yes, he was the better known Shakespeare, but his brother Edmund also participated in London theatre. He was more interested in the acting aspect of theatre than the writing. Edmund was the youngest sibling (six years younger than Shakespeare).

2. It wasn't all doom and gloom. If you've ever studied Macbeth, Hamlet or King Lear, you may recall leaving a lecture feeling almost suicidal, but Shakespeare was in fact a fan of comedy. Think back to characters such as the Fool in Lear; not very funny for us today but would have made an Elizabethan audience roar with laughter.

3. We all use words that Shakespeare invented. Eyeball, bloodstained, radiance, assassination - take your pick.

4. His sonnets aren't all autobiographical. No, they aren't all love letters to his wife Anne Hathaway, sonnets were in fact a way of showing off your technical writing skills. Iambic pentameter, stressed and unstressed syllables, ring any bells?

5. He wasn't rich for all of his career. Shakespeare didn't immediately become rich from his writings, his career was struggle of success as some plays were more popular than others and he even struggled to pay the bills. However, he did end up buying the biggest house in Stratford and had shares in the Globe Theatre.

6. He doesn't have any descendants. Hamnet, Shakespeare's only son, died at the age of 11. Susanna had no children, and Judith's children died. Shakespeare's family tree lived a short life of 25 years after his death.

7. Shakespeare is credited by The Oxford Dictionary for the introduction of almost 3,000 words into the English language.

8. Shakespeare's father followed a very different career path to him.
At one point he was getting paid to drink beer. In 1556, he was appointed as the borough's official "ale taster" which meant he would have to check bread and malt liquors.

9. Shakespeare's parents were most likely uneducated and his children were probably illiterate. Nothing is completely certain, however, it is likely that John and Mary Shakespeare never learnt how to read or write and his children were the same, although Susanna could just about scribble her signature down. This wasn't unusual for the Elizabethan period. Shakespeare was one of the lucky few and attended Stratford's grammar school.

10. We probably don't spell Shakespeare's name correctly, and neither did he. Shappere, Shaxberd, Willm Shakp, Willm Shakspere - yup, he's used them all.