Saturday, 22 November 2014

Wuthering Heights - Feminist Criticism



   Emily Bronte's 1847 Gothic romance novel, Wuthering Heights, can easily be analysed and critiqued through a feminist lens. The novel is seen by many critics as a novel that introduced a change in the way women were coming to be observed in society and how things were changing for women, thus making this novel a controversial one. Bronte conveys this change in society not only through female characters such as Catherine Earnshaw, but surprisingly through Heathcliff's character also.   
   The Victorian period was a hard time for women as they had to measure up to what was expected of them. For example, the Victorian feminine ideal was a woman that was 'the angel in the house'; a feminine figure that ensured hospitality and a moral guide, and also to be a paragon of virtue. Women were to be molded into this ideal and were expected to live by it. Catherine is seen by many as a feminist role model and her independence in the beginning of the novel separates her from the female norms of this period. Catherine doesn't care for dresses and being pretty she would much rather play on the moors with Heathcliff barefoot. However we see how Catherine eventually falls into being a lady through her transformation at Thrushcross Grange. Nelly refers to Catherine's transformation as a "reform" (Bronte, 1847, pg. 63) This shows the audience to see how a woman can't lead a carefree life in Victorian society, the conventions give security for women. Lyn Pykett explains how Catherine's transformation illuminates the power of the social production of female gentility. Furthermore, we see how her personality changes with the change in her appearance. As Catherine confides in Nelly Dean about her acceptance of Edgar's hand in marriage, we discover how her place as a woman in society has been persuaded by the conventions that have been set up for women. Social ambition is what motivates her now, not her wild passions and love. She explains "It would degrade me to marry Heathcliff now; so he shall never know I love him" (pg. 86). Here we see how Catherine has moved from changing the conventions on her own terms, too succumbing to the conventions for women.  
   As Catherine succumbs to becoming a lady, Heathcliff also falls into a position of equal powerlessness. Heathcliff is disempowered due to him being dark skinned and "gipsy in aspect" (pg. 27), he has no prospects and isn't heir to any money or property. This way Heathcliff can be read as a male character with a female position in society. He is not eligible. Edgar is the one who is always referred to as 'the master' and is the one who has all the power and masculinity. Heathcliff is feminine next to Edgar and he is dispossessed, ruled by the father and an outcast from society with his unknown background. The fact that Catherine spoils her own destiny and accepts Edgar to be her husband is a display of the struggle for women in society. Money and property was a key aspect of acceptance. Because Heathcliff isn't worthy in societies eyes (despite being worthy in Catherine's eyes) she goes against her own wishes and hearts desires.  
   Despite Catherine's rejection of Heathcliff for a better life, they both end up in the same condition at the end of the novel; unable to eat and feverish. There are suggestions that Heathcliff is a complimentary part of Catherine throughout the novel. First he is the manifestation of Catherine's desire for a whip. He is "a complimentary addition to her being who fleshes out all her lacks" (pg. 265). Then Catherine states that "he is more myself than I am" (pg. 88) and also Heathcliff arranges for his body to merge with Catherine's after death so that they become indistinguishable. All of these points collectively support the idea of Heathcliff being portrayed as a female type character. Furthermore, the fact that he is dis-empowered and is characterized as the female puts more strain on his relationship with Catherine and pushes them further apart. The idea that they won't fit together becomes more apparent.  
   Female writers in the Victorian period were directed to abstain from writing social and political criticism in their work in their work because of their restricted position as female writers in the literary world. Critics have argued that the rural and remote setting of Wuthering Heights can be a representation of women's remote position from society and modern industry.   
   Wuthering Heights has attracted a large number of feminist critics due to the autobiographical nature of the novel. Emily Bronte would have drawn on her personal experiences as a female in a society where women were highly inferior to men. Feminists readings of the novel illuminate the focus on a "female tradition" in Victorian literature. Bronte can be seen as started a new female tradition with this female empowering novel.   Lyn Pykkets essay titled "Changing The Names: The Two Catherines" (Pykett, 1989, pg. 86) highlights the mirroring of both Catherine and Cathy. Pykett supports my point that Emily Bronte's views are shown through the novel and its plot is contradictory to the ideas of women during the period. For example, Catherine's marriage to Edgar should have resolved her issues and fulfilled her social ambition but instead it deepens her problems. Catherine's inner conflict begins when she is still a child. Catherine begins life as a carefree, independent female who is more concerned with nature and being outdoors than the domestic sphere and its constraints. This is the beginning of her inner conflict; who she is inside and who she is expected to be. Lyn Pykett explains the "difficulties of trying to be the heroine of one's own life in a social and domestic milieu which cannot provide a theater for heroinism" (pg. 92) . She adds on the point that Catherine's sense of power does not leave her with a feeling of self fulfillment. I agree with this point indefinitely but it is also apparent that the only way Catherine can or would achieve complete self fulfilment would be if she could be with Heathcliff, he is her counterpart and soul mate. The social constraints that restrict Catherine is what prevents her from reaching the fulfillment that she so desperately sought after.   
   It is interesting to look closer at Cathy's character and question whether or not she is a representation of what Catherine's life would have been like lest she refused Edgars hand in marriage. It has been discussed that Cathy and Hareton's relationship can be interpreted as similar to the relationship that Catherine and Heathcliff would have shared, had they become a couple and obviated the social normality's that protruded on their daily lives and caused them such heartache. It is exciting to watch Cathy and Hareton's relationship as it acts out what we as an audience so desperately wanted to see happen with Catherine and Heathcliff. Pykett describes Heathcliff as "an unfulfilled possibility, a route not taken" (pg. 469). However, the fact that Heathcliff and Catherine could not be together adds to the realism of the novel and is needed in the plot to give a truthful image of the feminine inferiority of the Victorian period. Situations similar to what Heathcliff and Catherine undertake would have been common and it is the fact that we know that Catherine wants to abstain from the marital traditions and rebel is what makes this novel both interesting and controversial. The truthfulness of Catherine's struggle in the novel is what makes Wuthering Heights so open and appealing to feminist criticism and furthermore, historical criticism.    
   The beginning of the novel and indeed the most part of it is key in deciphering the story of Catherine Earnshaw. Lockwood is the one who discovers her late identities scratched into paint in his quarters during his visit to Wuthering Heights. Lockwood's revelation of the writings is an important part of the narrative as it lays out Catherine's journey through her relationships and maps out the stages of her feelings before we learn about them.
Lockwood reads:   
"This writing was nothing but a name repeated in all kinds of characters large and small -
Catherine Earnshaw, here and there varied to Catherine Heathcliff, and then again to Catherine Linton" (pg. 38). The variation of both the style of writing and placement can be seen as a representation of the mixture of emotions that Catherine endured and also the uncertainty in her life. This moment when Lockwood discovers her graffiti is what sets up the narrative for us and fires up our curiosity. Furthermore, Catherine writing down two marital names would have been very unusual to a Victorian audience. It is another instance where feminist criticism thrives as having two marital names suggests that Catherine was married twice at first glance. This would have been both interesting to an audience and recognized as a rarity to most. Both names circulate through the text and each name is associated with a different aspect of Catherine's personality. When she is Catherine Linton, she is posing as the person society wants her to be, the person she is expected to be in both the public sphere and the private sphere; the 'angel in the house'. As Catherine Heathcliff, she is who she wants be, who she really is. As we journey through the novel, we become more sympathetic towards Catherine in relation to her writing Heathcliff as her surname. This is because we can see that she knows she can never be Catherine Heathcliff but amidst her real title as Catherine Linton, her desire to be Heathcliff's wife is still present.  
   The novel as a whole raises the question 'What is a woman?' or 'What does a woman want?'. Both questions are essentially based around Catherine's inability to choose between two men. This is a typical plot that a Victorian romance novel would follow, however, Bronte defines the plot in her novel by displaying the difficulties living as a woman. Catherine is interpreted as the heroine in the novel, however, she can't be the heroine of her own life because she is doomed by her gender. She has no authority where she needs it most. Bronte uses the question "What Is a woman?" and shows us what a woman really is, and what she has to be. Catherine is the creator of feminism in the novel. Wuthering Heights represents a new age in literature and a change in a dominantly patriarchal society.  

Bibliography  

-  Barr, K. (2011) Representation of Women In Gothic Literature: Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available: http://suite101.com/a/representation-of-women-in-gothic-literature-wutheringheights-a343037  Page Break  
-  Bronte, E. (1847) Wuthering Heights. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.  - Gilbert, S & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: the Women Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literature Imagination. [Online] Available:
-  Jacobs, E. (2011) Reflections Of Elizabeth: Feminist Criticism and Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available: http://elizjacobs.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/feminist-criticism-andwuthering.html   
-  Peterson, L. (2003) Wuthering Heights: Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. 2nd edn.
London: PALGRAVE.  
-  Pykett, L. (1989) Women Writers: Emily Bronte. USA: Barnes & Noble Books.  - Senf, C. (1985) Emily Bronte's version of Feminist History: Wuthering Heights. [Online] Available:

4 comments: